From dbc4134385a10cbf0bdd6241108f54d7d4f78580 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wangjohn Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:22:31 -0500 Subject: Refactored nested associations so they are more readable. Added comments which make it clearer about what's going on. --- .../lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb | 80 +++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) (limited to 'activerecord/lib') diff --git a/activerecord/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb b/activerecord/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb index c5bd11edbf..602ab9e2f4 100644 --- a/activerecord/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb +++ b/activerecord/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb @@ -269,23 +269,36 @@ module ActiveRecord self.nested_attributes_options = nested_attributes_options type = (reflection.collection? ? :collection : :one_to_one) - - # def pirate_attributes=(attributes) - # assign_nested_attributes_for_one_to_one_association(:pirate, attributes, mass_assignment_options) - # end - generated_feature_methods.module_eval <<-eoruby, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1 - if method_defined?(:#{association_name}_attributes=) - remove_method(:#{association_name}_attributes=) - end - def #{association_name}_attributes=(attributes) - assign_nested_attributes_for_#{type}_association(:#{association_name}, attributes) - end - eoruby + generate_association_writer(association_name, type) else raise ArgumentError, "No association found for name `#{association_name}'. Has it been defined yet?" end end end + + private + + # Generates a writer method for this association. Serves as a point for + # accessing the objects in the association. For example, this method + # could generate the following: + # + # def pirate_attributes=(attributes) + # assign_nested_attributes_for_one_to_one_association(:pirate, attributes) + # end + # + # This redirects the attempts to write objects in an association through + # the helper methods defined below. Makes it seem like the nested + # associations are just regular associations. + def generate_association_writer(association_name, type) + generated_feature_methods.module_eval <<-eoruby, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1 + if method_defined?(:#{association_name}_attributes=) + remove_method(:#{association_name}_attributes=) + end + def #{association_name}_attributes=(attributes) + assign_nested_attributes_for_#{type}_association(:#{association_name}, attributes) + end + eoruby + end end # Returns ActiveRecord::AutosaveAssociation::marked_for_destruction? It's @@ -371,20 +384,7 @@ module ActiveRecord raise ArgumentError, "Hash or Array expected, got #{attributes_collection.class.name} (#{attributes_collection.inspect})" end - if limit = options[:limit] - limit = case limit - when Symbol - send(limit) - when Proc - limit.call - else - limit - end - - if limit && attributes_collection.size > limit - raise TooManyRecords, "Maximum #{limit} records are allowed. Got #{attributes_collection.size} records instead." - end - end + check_record_limit!(options[:limit], attributes_collection) if attributes_collection.is_a? Hash keys = attributes_collection.keys @@ -433,6 +433,29 @@ module ActiveRecord end end + # Takes in a limit and checks if the attributes_collection has too many + # records. The method will take limits in the form of symbols, procs, and + # number-like objects (anything that can be compared with an integer). + # + # Will raise an TooManyRecords error if the attributes_collection is + # larger than the limit. + def check_record_limit!(limit, attributes_collection) + if limit + limit = case limit + when Symbol + send(limit) + when Proc + limit.call + else + limit + end + + if limit && attributes_collection.size > limit + raise TooManyRecords, "Maximum #{limit} records are allowed. Got #{attributes_collection.size} records instead." + end + end + end + # Updates a record with the +attributes+ or marks it for destruction if # +allow_destroy+ is +true+ and has_destroy_flag? returns +true+. def assign_to_or_mark_for_destruction(record, attributes, allow_destroy) @@ -452,6 +475,11 @@ module ActiveRecord has_destroy_flag?(attributes) || call_reject_if(association_name, attributes) end + # Determines if a record with the particular +attributes+ should be + # rejected by calling the reject_if Symbol or Proc (if defined). + # The reject_if option is defined by +accepts_nested_attributes_for+. + # + # Returns false if there is a +destroy_flag+ on the attributes. def call_reject_if(association_name, attributes) return false if has_destroy_flag?(attributes) case callback = self.nested_attributes_options[association_name][:reject_if] -- cgit v1.2.3