From 3370ad0b1e883c9ec24c771f6c52b296a71eff40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aaron Patterson Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:11:50 -0700 Subject: making sure respond_to? works properly --- actionpack/test/dispatch/uploaded_file_test.rb | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) (limited to 'actionpack/test/dispatch/uploaded_file_test.rb') diff --git a/actionpack/test/dispatch/uploaded_file_test.rb b/actionpack/test/dispatch/uploaded_file_test.rb index 4173ce0a44..c81797a73f 100644 --- a/actionpack/test/dispatch/uploaded_file_test.rb +++ b/actionpack/test/dispatch/uploaded_file_test.rb @@ -45,5 +45,20 @@ module ActionDispatch uf = Http::UploadedFile.new(:tempfile => tf.new) assert_equal('thunderhorse', uf.tenderlove { 'thunderhorse' }) end + + def test_delegate_respects_respond_to? + tf = Class.new { def tenderlove; yield end; private :tenderlove } + uf = Http::UploadedFile.new(:tempfile => tf.new) + assert_raises(NoMethodError) do + uf.tenderlove + end + end + + def test_respond_to? + tf = Class.new { def tenderlove; yield end } + uf = Http::UploadedFile.new(:tempfile => tf.new) + assert uf.respond_to?(:headers), 'responds to headers' + assert uf.respond_to?(:tenderlove), 'responds to tenderlove' + end end end -- cgit v1.2.3