From f1637bf2bb00490203503fbd943b73406e043d1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Prem Sichanugrist Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 15:34:36 -0400 Subject: Remove Active Resource source files from the repository Dear Active Resource, It's not that I hate you or anything, but you didn't get much attention lately. There're so many alternatives out there, and I think people have made their choice to use them than you. I think it's time for you to have a big rest, peacefully in this Git repository. I will miss you, @sikachu. --- actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/url_helper.rb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'actionpack/lib/action_view') diff --git a/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/url_helper.rb b/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/url_helper.rb index f4946e65b5..29f556502b 100644 --- a/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/url_helper.rb +++ b/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/url_helper.rb @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ module ActionView # # ==== Relying on named routes # - # Passing a record (like an Active Record or Active Resource) instead of a Hash as the options parameter will + # Passing a record (like an Active Record) instead of a Hash as the options parameter will # trigger the named route for that record. The lookup will happen on the name of the class. So passing a # Workshop object will attempt to use the +workshop_path+ route. If you have a nested route, such as # +admin_workshop_path+ you'll have to call that explicitly (it's impossible for +url_for+ to guess that route). -- cgit v1.2.3