From 447b6a4e678ab1618bdcd130e30c288b0a25297a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xavier Noria Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 00:27:56 +0200 Subject: removes usage of Object#in? from the code base (the method remains defined by Active Support) Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base. After some discussion in https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough for this particular idiom. In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked the most in each case. --- actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing') diff --git a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb index 2b3095a234..ab584abf68 100644 --- a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb +++ b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ module ActionDispatch define_method(method) do |*args| reset! unless integration_session # reset the html_document variable, but only for new get/post calls - @html_document = nil unless method.in?(["cookies", "assigns"]) + @html_document = nil unless method == 'cookies' || method == 'assigns' integration_session.__send__(method, *args).tap do copy_session_variables! end -- cgit v1.2.3