From ca9ac310028d0009edf1fbf657541d2dea327535 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryuta Kamizono Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:29:05 +0900 Subject: `respond_to_missing?` should be private Follow up of 03d3f036. Some of `respond_to?` were replaced to `respond_to_missing?` in 03d3f036. But the visibility is still public. It should be private. --- actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb') diff --git a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb index 2e2db98ad6..2416c58817 100644 --- a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb +++ b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/integration.rb @@ -385,14 +385,15 @@ module ActionDispatch integration_session.default_url_options = options end - def respond_to_missing?(method, include_private = false) - integration_session.respond_to?(method, include_private) || super + private + def respond_to_missing?(method, _) + integration_session.respond_to?(method) || super end # Delegate unhandled messages to the current session instance. - def method_missing(sym, *args, &block) - if integration_session.respond_to?(sym) - integration_session.__send__(sym, *args, &block).tap do + def method_missing(method, *args, &block) + if integration_session.respond_to?(method) + integration_session.public_send(method, *args, &block).tap do copy_session_variables! end else -- cgit v1.2.3