From 6cf671b61e35a94ec8e6acad0aaef85822c93eb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Griffin Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:59:11 -0700 Subject: Allow `method: "all"` as a valid routing test option This allows the test to mirror the production code, since `via: :all` is a valid option. The behavior in 4.1 did not actually test that it matched all verbs, but instead defaulted to testing for "GET". This implementation aims to better handle the intention of passing "all". What will actually be asserted doesn't quite match up with the generated route, since it appears to just not create a constraint on the method. However, I don't think that we can easily test the lack of that constraint. Testing each of the main 4 HTTP verbs seems to be a reasonably close approximation, which should be sufficient for our needs. Fixes #18511. --- .../action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions') diff --git a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb index 28dc88d317..c3e998a864 100644 --- a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb +++ b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb @@ -38,18 +38,24 @@ module ActionDispatch # # Test a custom route # assert_recognizes({controller: 'items', action: 'show', id: '1'}, 'view/item1') def assert_recognizes(expected_options, path, extras={}, msg=nil) - request = recognized_request_for(path, extras, msg) + if path.is_a?(Hash) && path[:method].to_s == "all" + [:get, :post, :put, :delete].each do |method| + assert_recognizes(expected_options, path.merge(method: method), extras, msg) + end + else + request = recognized_request_for(path, extras, msg) - expected_options = expected_options.clone + expected_options = expected_options.clone - expected_options.stringify_keys! + expected_options.stringify_keys! - msg = message(msg, "") { - sprintf("The recognized options <%s> did not match <%s>, difference:", - request.path_parameters, expected_options) - } + msg = message(msg, "") { + sprintf("The recognized options <%s> did not match <%s>, difference:", + request.path_parameters, expected_options) + } - assert_equal(expected_options, request.path_parameters, msg) + assert_equal(expected_options, request.path_parameters, msg) + end end # Asserts that the provided options can be used to generate the provided path. This is the inverse of +assert_recognizes+. -- cgit v1.2.3