From ee395fe626760e897abd9e881b54d3cc3f407d31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Peek Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:09:44 -0600 Subject: TestProcess belongs in AD --- .../action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/tag.rb | 19 ++++++++-- 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions') diff --git a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb index 4bc5275e04..794fb888b7 100644 --- a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb +++ b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/routing.rb @@ -126,6 +126,46 @@ module ActionDispatch assert_generates(path.is_a?(Hash) ? path[:path] : path, options, defaults, extras, message) end + # A helper to make it easier to test different route configurations. + # This method temporarily replaces ActionController::Routing::Routes + # with a new RouteSet instance. + # + # The new instance is yielded to the passed block. Typically the block + # will create some routes using map.draw { map.connect ... }: + # + # with_routing do |set| + # set.draw do |map| + # map.connect ':controller/:action/:id' + # assert_equal( + # ['/content/10/show', {}], + # map.generate(:controller => 'content', :id => 10, :action => 'show') + # end + # end + # end + # + def with_routing + real_routes = ActionController::Routing::Routes + ActionController::Routing.module_eval { remove_const :Routes } + + temporary_routes = ActionController::Routing::RouteSet.new + ActionController::Routing.module_eval { const_set :Routes, temporary_routes } + + yield temporary_routes + ensure + if ActionController::Routing.const_defined? :Routes + ActionController::Routing.module_eval { remove_const :Routes } + end + ActionController::Routing.const_set(:Routes, real_routes) if real_routes + end + + def method_missing(selector, *args, &block) + if @controller && ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.helpers.include?(selector) + @controller.send(selector, *args, &block) + else + super + end + end + private # Recognizes the route for a given path. def recognized_request_for(path, request_method = nil) diff --git a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/tag.rb b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/tag.rb index ef6867576e..b74dcb1fe4 100644 --- a/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/tag.rb +++ b/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing/assertions/tag.rb @@ -76,10 +76,10 @@ module ActionDispatch # # Assert that there is a "span" containing between 2 and 4 "em" tags # # as immediate children # assert_tag :tag => "span", - # :children => { :count => 2..4, :only => { :tag => "em" } } + # :children => { :count => 2..4, :only => { :tag => "em" } } # # # Get funky: assert that there is a "div", with an "ul" ancestor - # # and an "li" parent (with "class" = "enum"), and containing a + # # and an "li" parent (with "class" = "enum"), and containing a # # "span" descendant that contains text matching /hello world/ # assert_tag :tag => "div", # :ancestor => { :tag => "ul" }, @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ module ActionDispatch tag = find_tag(opts) assert tag, "expected tag, but no tag found matching #{opts.inspect} in:\n#{@response.body.inspect}" end - + # Identical to +assert_tag+, but asserts that a matching tag does _not_ # exist. (See +assert_tag+ for a full discussion of the syntax.) # @@ -118,6 +118,19 @@ module ActionDispatch tag = find_tag(opts) assert !tag, "expected no tag, but found tag matching #{opts.inspect} in:\n#{@response.body.inspect}" end + + def find_tag(conditions) + html_document.find(conditions) + end + + def find_all_tag(conditions) + html_document.find_all(conditions) + end + + def html_document + xml = @response.content_type =~ /xml$/ + @html_document ||= HTML::Document.new(@response.body, false, xml) + end end end end -- cgit v1.2.3