| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
activerecord/test/cases/associations/belongs_to_associations_test.rb
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
reason)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
option
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fix ORA-00972 error at test_rename_table_with_prefix_and_suffix
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fix a wrong return value from reset_sequence_name method.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|/ / / / / / / / / / / / |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|/ / / / / / / / / / / |
|
|/ / / / / / / / / /
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
The main reason for this is that I want to separate the code that does
the mutating from the code that does the cloning.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Get a properly aliased_table_name, when we use a polymorphic association.
|
| |/ / / / / / / / / |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
So a NullRelation (Relation#none) is chainable with database methods.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Closes #5202 and #919
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(as described in #5667)
|
|/ / / / / / / / /
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The #relation method gets called in four places and the return value was instantly cloned in three of them. The only place that did not clone was ActiveRecord::Scoping::Default::ClassMethods#unscoped. This introduced a bug described in #5667 and should really clone the relation, too. This means all four places would clone the relation, so it doesn't make a lot of sense caching it in the first place.
The four places with calls to relations are:
activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/default.rb:110:in `block in build_default_scope'"
activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/default.rb:42:in `unscoped'"
activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/named.rb:38:in `scoped'"
activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/named.rb:52:in `scope_attributes'"
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fix deleting from a HABTM join table upon destroying an object of a model with optimistic locking enabled.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Nested attribute setters can be overridden.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Overriding implementation can call super.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|/ / / / / / / / / / |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
closes #2737
Conflicts:
activerecord/lib/active_record/coders/yaml_column.rb
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Don't use this:
scope :red, where(color: 'red')
default_scope where(color: 'red')
Use this:
scope :red, -> { where(color: 'red') }
default_scope { where(color: 'red') }
The former has numerous issues. It is a common newbie gotcha to do
the following:
scope :recent, where(published_at: Time.now - 2.weeks)
Or a more subtle variant:
scope :recent, -> { where(published_at: Time.now - 2.weeks) }
scope :recent_red, recent.where(color: 'red')
Eager scopes are also very complex to implement within Active
Record, and there are still bugs. For example, the following does
not do what you expect:
scope :remove_conditions, except(:where)
where(...).remove_conditions # => still has conditions
|
| |_|_|/ / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
scope is syntactic sugar for defining a class method. Ruby allows
redefining methods but emits a warning when run with -w. So let's
not implement our own logic for this. Users should run with -w if they
want to be warned about redefined methods.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|