From a19d98ce7e590e6c7f82aa08f7e9791a72e2e8bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Harald Eilertsen Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 14:14:41 +0200 Subject: Split english and norwegian posts. This turned out a bit different than I initially though. The english and norwegian sections will essentially be separate. Afaict there's no direct way to make a "combined view" listing both english and norwegian posts. However, I think that's fine. Let's roll with this for now. --- .../2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.md | 25 ---------------------- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) create mode 100644 content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md delete mode 100644 content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.md (limited to 'content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity') diff --git a/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md b/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b68bd12 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ ++++ +title = "Are we up for anonymity?" +lang = "en" + +[taxonomies] +tags = ["press", "freedom", "anonymity", "privacy", "surveillance"] + +[extra] +author = "harald" ++++ + +The Berliner Gazette explores the negative stigma around anonymity, and asks +what this means for a free press and privacy. + +> The dominant narrative of anonymity, as portrayed in popular media, is an +> unflattering one and its usage is associated with trolling, seedy +> transactions, harassment and terrorism. The conventional wisdom seems to be +> that online anonymity protects criminals and enables the hateful and toxic +> side of human nature. Such a negative reputation undermines an important +> practice with many legitimate uses. Anonymity can also offer vital protection +> to those who need it most. + +Read the [full article]. + +[full article]: http://berlinergazette.de/are-we-up-for-anonymity/ diff --git a/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.md b/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.md deleted file mode 100644 index b68bd12..0000000 --- a/content/blog/2015-12-24-are-we-up-for-anonymity/index.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,25 +0,0 @@ -+++ -title = "Are we up for anonymity?" -lang = "en" - -[taxonomies] -tags = ["press", "freedom", "anonymity", "privacy", "surveillance"] - -[extra] -author = "harald" -+++ - -The Berliner Gazette explores the negative stigma around anonymity, and asks -what this means for a free press and privacy. - -> The dominant narrative of anonymity, as portrayed in popular media, is an -> unflattering one and its usage is associated with trolling, seedy -> transactions, harassment and terrorism. The conventional wisdom seems to be -> that online anonymity protects criminals and enables the hateful and toxic -> side of human nature. Such a negative reputation undermines an important -> practice with many legitimate uses. Anonymity can also offer vital protection -> to those who need it most. - -Read the [full article]. - -[full article]: http://berlinergazette.de/are-we-up-for-anonymity/ -- cgit v1.2.3