From 208a8b6c2eb5f029ff1927f3cb3ff4d1758662b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Harald Eilertsen Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 01:18:48 +0200 Subject: New post: iHuman in Film section. --- content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/ihuman-poster.jpg | Bin 0 -> 160224 bytes content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/index.en.md | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+) create mode 100644 content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/ihuman-poster.jpg create mode 100644 content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/index.en.md diff --git a/content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/ihuman-poster.jpg b/content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/ihuman-poster.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ae1dfba Binary files /dev/null and b/content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/ihuman-poster.jpg differ diff --git a/content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/index.en.md b/content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/index.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3125a9c --- /dev/null +++ b/content/film/2020-07-02-ihuman/index.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ ++++ +title = "iHuman" + +[taxonomies] +tags = ["documentary", "ai", "technology", "society"] + +[extra] +author = "harald" +genre = "Documentary" +country = "Norway" +year = 2019 ++++ + +{% figure(img="ihuman-poster.jpg", alt="iHUMAN poster") %} +iHUMAN poster +{% end %} + +The Norwegian documentary _iHuman_ explores the current state of artificial +intelligence by letting some of the formative people in the business speak more +or less freely. Both the people who work on AI, and sees the technology in a +positive light, and the sceptics and those wary of it. Together they paint a +fairly bleak picture of what is ahead. + + + +The strength of this documentary is that it does not try to hide either side. +It lets the people involved speak for themselves. While the end picture may be +bleak, it is also complex — there are no easy answers. Neither does the film try +to provide any. It does however, give a good overview of the powers that +fight for control over this space. + +I don't think I spoil too much when revealing that the research, funding and +development of advanced AI is dominated by a handful of extremely powerful +companies in cooperation with another handful of shady nation states and their +militaries. These may not be the people or organizations we want to dictate the +future development of our global society. + +All in all there's no surprises here. All of this is fairly well known to anyone +who has paid any attention to the way the tech industry has evolved over the past +decades. Still it is a good reminder that we should be sceptical when the most +profitable companies in the world claims to have our interest in mind, and that +they know what's best for us. + +We should question their motives, their relentless and unregulated collection of +data about us, and their power over political processes, both through lobbying +and more covert and manipualative ways. The film touches on these questions, but +there's limits to how deep you can go in a mere one and a half hour. + +Still it gives a lot of food for thought, and hopefully gives us more of an idea +about which questions we should ask. + +As one of the subjects in the documentary says: In the end this isn't a +question about technology. It's a question of what kind of world we want to +live in. -- cgit v1.2.3