From ffb1997902facb36b78a7cfa522f41f2b3d71cda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Macgirvin <mike@macgirvin.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:14:17 -0700
Subject: mistpark 2.0 infrasturcture lands

---
 .../HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt

(limited to 'library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt')

diff --git a/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt b/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..58c81dcc4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+URI.Munge
+TYPE: string/null
+VERSION: 1.3.0
+DEFAULT: NULL
+--DESCRIPTION--
+
+<p>
+    Munges all browsable (usually http, https and ftp)
+    absolute URIs into another URI, usually a URI redirection service.
+    This directive accepts a URI, formatted with a <code>%s</code> where
+    the url-encoded original URI should be inserted (sample:
+    <code>http://www.google.com/url?q=%s</code>).
+</p>
+<p>
+    Uses for this directive:
+</p>
+<ul>
+    <li>
+        Prevent PageRank leaks, while being fairly transparent
+        to users (you may also want to add some client side JavaScript to
+        override the text in the statusbar). <strong>Notice</strong>:
+        Many security experts believe that this form of protection does not deter spam-bots.
+    </li>
+    <li>
+        Redirect users to a splash page telling them they are leaving your
+        website. While this is poor usability practice, it is often mandated
+        in corporate environments.
+    </li>
+</ul>
+<p>
+    Prior to HTML Purifier 3.1.1, this directive also enabled the munging
+    of browsable external resources, which could break things if your redirection
+    script was a splash page or used <code>meta</code> tags. To revert to
+    previous behavior, please use %URI.MungeResources.
+</p>
+<p>
+    You may want to also use %URI.MungeSecretKey along with this directive
+    in order to enforce what URIs your redirector script allows. Open
+    redirector scripts can be a security risk and negatively affect the
+    reputation of your domain name.
+</p>
+<p>
+    Starting with HTML Purifier 3.1.1, there is also these substitutions:
+</p>
+<table>
+    <thead>
+        <tr>
+            <th>Key</th>
+            <th>Description</th>
+            <th>Example <code>&lt;a href=""&gt;</code></th>
+        </tr>
+    </thead>
+    <tbody>
+        <tr>
+            <td>%r</td>
+            <td>1 - The URI embeds a resource<br />(blank) - The URI is merely a link</td>
+            <td></td>
+        </tr>
+        <tr>
+            <td>%n</td>
+            <td>The name of the tag this URI came from</td>
+            <td>a</td>
+        </tr>
+        <tr>
+            <td>%m</td>
+            <td>The name of the attribute this URI came from</td>
+            <td>href</td>
+        </tr>
+        <tr>
+            <td>%p</td>
+            <td>The name of the CSS property this URI came from, or blank if irrelevant</td>
+            <td></td>
+        </tr>
+    </tbody>
+</table>
+<p>
+    Admittedly, these letters are somewhat arbitrary; the only stipulation
+    was that they couldn't be a through f. r is for resource (I would have preferred
+    e, but you take what you can get), n is for name, m
+    was picked because it came after n (and I couldn't use a), p is for
+    property.
+</p>
+--# vim: et sw=4 sts=4
-- 
cgit v1.2.3